Home > Reviews > GPTinf Review: Is GPTinf Effective at Bypassing AI Detection?
  • Employ BypassAI for Trouble-Free AI Detection Evasion

  • Introduction to GPTinf

  • Does GPTinf Stand Up to AI Detection?

  • GPTinf's Competition: BypassAI

  • Is BypassAI Superior to GPTinf in Dodging AI Detection?

  • Examining GPTinf versus BypassAI: A Comparison of Outcomes

  • Summing Up

GPTinf Review: Is GPTinf Effective at Bypassing AI Detection?

AI detection software can effortlessly spot and flag content crafted employing resources like ChatGPT or Jasper AI. However, with AI humanizers such as GPTinf, there's the potential to rework AI-created content into a version untraceable by AI content detection instruments.

But does GPTinf truly live up to its promises? In this thorough evaluation of GPTinf, we will put the software to several tests to assess how well it can humanize your AI-rendered text.

Employ BypassAI for Trouble-Free AI Detection Evasion

For smooth bypassing of AI detectors, turn to BypassAI. Experience the potency of expert, superior-quality, and untraceable AI writing; make a start today!

Try BypassAI Now and Bypass All AI Detectors With Ease

Mode:
Enhanced
Purpose:
General Writing
Usage guidelines
empty iconYour humanized content will appear here.

Introduction to GPTinf

image5 (7).jpg

GPTinf, established in 2023, is a relatively nascent player in the AI landscape. It serves as a straightforward AI text humanizer that guarantees to dodge an expansive range of AI detector software, including the likes of Turnitin, GPTZero, Copyleaks, and more.

It operates on a monthly subscription plan, dependent on the volume of words you hope to rewrite each month. While the use of this platform requires account creation, it does offer a freeze-list option. This feature facilitates the "freezing" of particular keywords, precluding their replacement during rewriting. This functionality proves remarkably beneficial when handling specialized technical documents wherein specific words, expressions, and terminologies must be retained as is, to maintain accuracy.

Salient Features of GPTinf

  • Provides a free trial
  • Capable of evading a substantial variety of AI detectors
  • Offers the freeze-list feature to conserve specific words
  • Boasts a streamlined and minimalist design

Does GPTinf Stand Up to AI Detection?

An effective GPTinf evaluation necessitates determining whether content processed by GPTinf can successfully elude a range of AI detectors. To begin our investigation, let’s have some text generated using ChatGPT. For this exercise, we tasked ChatGPT to scribe a brief article on the future of vehicle autopiloting.

image10 (6).jpg

The output is quite in conformity with what you'd anticipate from a piece written by ChatGPT, and at this juncture, one is quite likely to get detected. Therefore, let's take this text, input it into GPTinf, and review the outcome:

image8 (7).jpg

Right from the start, we encounter several inconsistencies in the revamped article. A common issue with AI humanizers is that their sentence rewriting efforts often lead to grammatically questionable results. This could be attributed to the text humanizer's attempt to replicate 'human errors' in the modified text to enhance the odds of slipping past AI detection by seeming more human with its flaws.

This is quite evident in the starting line of the 'More Safety' segment, where the phrase 'in the future' has been improperly replaced with 'in future', making the sentence feel more rigid. Additionally, the phrase 'usher in', as seen in the last sentence, has been mistakenly converted to 'usher-in'.

With such discrepancies cropping up across the length of your piece, you might find yourself forced to resort to manual editing to ensure its presentability, which could, in turn, demand additional time and efforts. However, let's presume you're content with the outcomes as they stand. Let's investigate how it bears up against diverse AI detectors:

Testing GPTinf Against Originality.ai

The article processed by GPTinf was flagged as AI-authored by Originality.ai. The entirety of the visible text from the article is highlighted in red, indicating that AI-authorship was detected by the software. Originality.ai assigned the article a score of 15% original and 85% AI, which is far from the desired outcome.

image3 (5).jpg

For those new to these tools' scoring systems, these percentages do not imply that the article comprises, for instance, 15% original work and 85% AI work. Rather, these figures represent the tool's confidence levels. In this scenario, Originality.ai is 85% certain that the article was generated by an AI.

Pitting GPTinf Against GPTZero

The performance of GPTinf sinks further when placed against GPTZero. In GPTZero's evaluation, AI-constructed sentences are highlighted in yellow, and as observable from the screenshot, every sentence in the text receives this flag.

image9 (9).jpg

GPTZero's final verdict is a score of 94% AI and 6% human. It also assigns a rating for "mixed" sentences, or sentences constructed using a blend of AI and human input, but for our sample text, the tool shows a 0% likelihood for this category of content.

GPTinf's Performance Against Copyleaks

In contrast to the other two tools, Copyleaks provides a more unequivocal result. Every sentence in the text is highlighted in red, which signifies that the article was created by an AI. This further strengthens the evidence that multiple independent AI detectors are consistently marking the same piece as AI-produced content.

image11 (5).jpg

GPTinf's Competition: BypassAI

bypassai-home

The observations from the aforementioned evaluation of GPTinf clearly suggest that, despite its appealing design and the neat little function to freeze select words, GPTinf is not entirely dependable. Even if you disregard AI detectors, the text already incorporates minor inaccuracies that require rectification. Moreover, you'll be investing effort in content that fails to dodge AI detection altogether.

If you're seeking a tool that exemplifies more consistent performance and offers added functionality, then BypassAI is a considerably superior option. BypassAI is capable of processing and managing text generated by AI language models like ChatGPT, Jasper, Bard, or GPT-4, and then delivering humanized content that can effortlessly bypass AI content detectors such as GPTZero and Originality.ai.

All AI Detectors are Within the Reach of BypassAI

GPTZero
ZeroGPT
Originality.ai
Turnitin
Winston AI
Copyleaks
Writer
Content at Scale
Sapling
brand img

Additionally, it employs cutting-edge text humanization technology to make AI-written content undetectable, yielding content that comes across as authored by a human from start to finish. Notably, for those worried about content originality, BypassAI assures that all its produced content is 100% free from plagiarism, ensuring you encounter no issues in publishing AI-crafted content as your own.

Key Features of BypassAI

  • Compatible with all sorts of AI-generated content
  • Employs sophisticated humanization technology
  • Encompasses an array of beneficial features
  • Consistent performance against well-known AI detectors
  • Delivers plagiarism-free content
  • Optimizes text humanization conducive to SEO
  • Capable of bypassing email spam filters

Is BypassAI Superior to GPTinf in Dodging AI Detection?

To robustly establish the enhanced efficiency of BypassAI in comparison to GPTinf, we plan to use the same article generated for the GPTinf evaluation, but process it using BypassAI. Subsequently, we'll subject the results to the same set of AI detectors showcased previously, offering a transparent comparison between the two platforms.

As a reference, here's what the outcome from BypassAI looks like:

bypassai-4.jpg

In contrast to GPTinf, this revision presents no blatant inaccuracies, saving you the task of performing a second check for spelling or grammar errors post-humanization. Now, let's assess the rewritten text using various AI detectors and analyze the outcomes.

Evaluating BypassAI Against Originality.ai

With results diametrically opposite to those of GPTinf, Originality.ai rates the BypassAI with a 91% as original and only 1% as AI-derived. This indicates the software is extremely convinced that the modified text is human-authored.

image7 (6).jpg

BypassAI Assessed Against GPTZero

Furthermore, BypassAI also performs well against GPTZero. Actually, the software attributed a 0% AI score, suggesting it didn't consider any part of the article entirely generated by AI. Despite a 6% mixed-content score, the majority of the article, as per GPTZero, is believed to be composed by humans.

image6 (6).jpg

BypassAI Reviewed Against Copyleaks

Similar to previous evaluations, Copyleaks provides us with straightforward results. No sentences are highlighted this time, leading to the conclusion that the article is primarily human-authored.

image1 (6).jpg

Examining GPTinf versus BypassAI: A Comparison of Outcomes

Here's a concise comparison of the results generated by both AI humanizers:

AI Detectors GPTinf Results BypassAI Results
Originality.ai 15% Human, 85% AI 91% Human, 9% AI
GPTZero 6% Human, 0% Mixed, 94% AI 94% Human, 6% Mixed, 0% AI
Copyleaks AI-Generated Human-Written

From the evaluation, it's evident that BypassAI outperforms in all the tests with significant leads. While GPTinf was consistently identified as AI-based, the humanized text produced by BypassAI convincingly passes as human-written in all AI detectors' eyes. Therefore, when it comes to content quality and the capability to evade AI detection, BypassAI emerges as a superior choice.

Summing Up

Although GPTinf has a user-friendly interface and intriguing text humanizing features, it ultimately falls short in successfully evading current AI detectors. Even if bypassing AI isn't your primary concern, the small inaccuracies in its output will force you to invest additional time for refinement, quite contrary to what you expect when working with AI.

The insights from this GPTinf review indicate that considering tools like BypassAI, which exhibit enhanced content quality and more consistent AI detection evasion capabilities, could yield better returns on your investment compared to GPTinf.

Related Posts

A Comprehensive Phrasly Review: Does It Work to Humanize AI Text

Phrasly touts itself as a stealthy AI writing tool that renders human-like characteristics to AI text, but does it actually live up to its claims? Unearth the truth in this comprehensive review of Phrasly.

In-depth Netus AI Review: Can Netus AI Make AI Content Undetectable?

Is Netus AI a dependable tool when it comes to rendering AI text undetectable and circumventing AI detection mechanisms? Explore our insights in this detailed Netus AI review.

CheatGPT Review: Is CheatGPT a Useful AI Detection Remover?

CheatGPT touts itself as the ultimate tool for bypassing AI detection. But does it live up to the hype? Explore its efficiency in evading AI identification in our comprehensive CheatGPT review.

CogniBypass Review: Does CogniBypass Work to Humanize AI Text?

How competent is CogniBypass in humanizing AI-created content? Can it successfully elude AI detection? Discover the answers in this comprehensive review of CogniBypass.